Following the 2022 Super Bowl, a new shopping app called TEMU began making waves with its bold slogan, “shop like a billionaire.” It didn’t take long for my mom to introduce me to the platform, gifting me an adorable teal Peep Easter plushie. TEMU quickly gained attention for offering everyday products at prices that frequently undercut dollar stores.
This isn’t an outsider’s perspective on TEMU—I experienced its features firsthand. Unlike traditional affiliate programs, TEMU introduced an innovative twist where users could play games to earn prizes. However, it soon became evident that these weren’t games in the typical sense. Outcomes were often pre-determined, requiring participants to recruit new users—or sometimes existing ones—to unlock rewards. The structure drew comparisons to multi-level marketing (MLM) schemes.
At the height of these games, I managed to secure nearly $1,000 worth of free items, though TEMU’s inflated pricing made that valuation questionable. Nevertheless, the thrill of earning prizes became addictive. Some of the early games, like Fishland and Hat Trick, could be won without recruiting new users, leading to the rise of online communities dedicated to maximizing these systems. Later, TEMU introduced Farmland, another “winnable” game. I found myself deeply involved, even running a group focused on Hat Trick strategies. Over time, TEMU altered the games, extending win times and reducing rewards, effectively ending the rapid-fire prize era.
Dedicated users often shared referral links across multiple social media groups. At one point, I was posting in 21 Facebook groups simultaneously, sometimes facing temporary restrictions or account locks due to my activity. With business pages to manage, this behavior bordered on reckless but felt justified in the pursuit of free items.
Despite the slowdown, I still log into the app to play Fishland, which I started months ago. The quick wins may be gone, but the habit remains. I’ve even deleted the app, only to reinstall it during late-night moments of boredom, feeding virtual fish in hopes of claiming about $20 worth of products.
TEMU’s reward system hinged on understanding the mechanics of its games. Early on, inviting new users—who didn’t need to make purchases—was the easiest way to unlock rewards, including $50 gift cards. However, TEMU’s data collection methods limited the ability to repeatedly exploit this system. The app tracked device identifiers (IMEI), requiring entirely new devices or phone numbers for additional signups. I went so far as to change my secondary phone number multiple times to earn rewards, reflecting just how far some of us were willing to go.
My husband was baffled by the steady stream of packages arriving at our doorstep. His skepticism about “free” items mirrored broader concerns—why was TEMU so generous? Initial reports suggested the company operated at staggering losses, spending billions to create the illusion of abundance and establish itself as a dominant marketplace. As someone with marketing and political science expertise, I couldn’t ignore the potential implications.
The primary explanation for TEMU’s strategy was practical—offering free merchandise was more effective than traditional advertising. Much like MLMs, leveraging personal networks created more trust than paid promotions. I personally introduced several people to the app, many of whom became regular buyers. At a time when inflation was squeezing budgets, it felt almost obligatory to share deals with friends and family.
Beyond frivolous items, TEMU stocked practical goods often priced significantly lower than Amazon and other retailers. I discovered items like bakeware, art supplies, and clothing that matched my expectations in quality. When something fell short, customer service was quick to issue refunds, often without requiring returns. While critics dismissed TEMU’s products as low-quality, I found them comparable to offerings at Walmart, Amazon, and Old Navy. Still, it’s important to acknowledge the ethical concerns tied to fast fashion and manufacturing practices in countries like Bangladesh.
TEMU’s pricing model raised additional concerns. Reports surfaced alleging unfair demands on sellers and even speculation about forced labor—claims that have also plagued platforms like SHEIN. While these allegations remain unproven, they warrant vigilance from socially conscious shoppers.
Another troubling theory about TEMU relates to data privacy. Some fear that the app serves as a tool for collecting data, potentially funneling information to the Chinese government. Similar fears have fueled legislative actions against apps like TikTok in the United States. TEMU’s parent company, Pinduoduo, faced app store removals due to spyware and malware allegations. Even if the primary goal is to sell user data for marketing purposes, the implications of this practice are unsettling.
Despite these issues, I continue to shop on TEMU, albeit more cautiously. While the social marketing aspect now feels exploitative, the core shopping experience remains appealing. Reflecting on my time with TEMU, I wonder if it’s fundamentally different from other platforms that thrive on referral-based growth. Its addictive appeal and affordability keep users engaged, even as free-item promotions dwindle.
TEMU’s rise highlights broader trends in consumer behavior. Platforms like Wish, SHEIN, and Amazon have embraced similar tactics, and dollar stores remain popular for their affordability. The pandemic only amplified demand for budget-friendly options, making online shopping an irresistible solution. With inflation persisting, the fear of missing out (FOMO) drives consumers to apps promising low prices and instant gratification.
Whether TEMU is a symptom of larger economic trends or something more insidious, its impact is undeniable. As consumers, we must balance convenience and affordability with ethical concerns and data privacy. TEMU may have changed the game, but the broader questions it raises about modern commerce are here to stay.
JOIN THE WEBINAR
